tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-48651295711910022792024-03-13T03:27:24.413-07:00Critiques-Questions-AnswersCritiques of Singularity concept of astophysics (Big Bang) and answers within a Steady State conceptAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14192765123201972571noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4865129571191002279.post-75570919215967590162013-01-19T12:24:00.000-08:002014-10-22T01:45:22.604-07:00Critiques-Questions-Answers<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="navbar section" id="navbar">
<div class="widget Navbar" id="Navbar1">
</div>
</div>
<div class="body-fauxcolumns">
<div class="fauxcolumn-outer body-fauxcolumn-outer">
<div class="cap-top">
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxcolumn-inner">
</div>
</div>
<div class="cap-bottom">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="content-fauxcolumns">
<div class="fauxcolumn-outer content-fauxcolumn-outer">
<div class="cap-top">
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxcolumn-inner">
</div>
</div>
<div class="cap-bottom">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="content-outer">
<div class="content-cap-top cap-top">
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left content-fauxborder-left">
<div class="content-inner">
Website:- <a href="http://www.chandlerpublishing.co.uk/">http://www.chandlerpublishing.co.uk/</a><br />
<br />
<header><div class="post hentry" itemprop="blogPost" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/BlogPosting">
<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-4028019514878443905" itemprop="description articleBody">
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia; mso-bidi-font-family: "Courier New"; mso-bidi-font-weight: normal; mso-font-kerning: 0pt;">ISBN <span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: "Courier New"; mso-bidi-font-weight: normal; mso-font-kerning: 0pt;">9780950812090</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia; mso-bidi-font-family: "Courier New"; mso-bidi-font-weight: normal; mso-font-kerning: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: "Courier New"; mso-bidi-font-weight: normal; mso-font-kerning: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Reference is made to Vortice Physics and Orientation Physics. These are published works, a synopsis of which can be <span style="font-size: small;">viewe</span>d on the website</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Courier New"; font-size: 13.5pt;"></span></b><span style="font-family: "Courier New"; font-size: 13.5pt;"></span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"> </b></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">UNIFICATION</span></span>
</div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> All attempts at unification of natural
phenomena from Einstein to present day physicists, have been fraught with difficulty
and no unification <span style="font-size: x-small;">of</span> quantum physics with classical physics has yet been achieved. Common
sense is that it can be unified. An elemental mass-field vortice (atom) is a
unified unit. Earth-Lunar system is unified, which forms part of a unified
solar system. The concept of gravity as a prime
force, does not adequately describe the dynamics about us. It does not describe
the phenomenon that universal mass is very much short of the theoretical amount
necessary for it to hold together. It does not describe how a force powerful
enough to account for weight, cannot be directly measured.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> It is contrary to common sense, as well as
thermodynamics, that an atom can function in isolation, without force acting on
it. If there is a continuum of natural phenomena, as there clearly is, why is
there a sharp divide between quantum physics, where widely believed forces
number four, to astrophysics, where force is widely held to be gravity alone?</span></span>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: lime;"><b>A</b></span>. Vortice Physics posit that an energy form
is all encompassing, from the micro to the macro scale. It accounts for the
functioning of all natural phenomena at a fundamental level. This force, which
has been glimpsed by many people from the ancients to present day, has eluded
description because it is intrinsically bound up with matter which it is
controlling. The energy is quantifiable by equating it with matter, but because
of its dual polarity nature, is not measurable by conventional instruments. Its
energies sum to zero at any one region. Vortice Physics posit that fundamental
forces, widely believed to number four, i.e. strong force, weak force, gravity,
and electromagnetic force, can be described as effects, and that these resolve
to one force. A relationship between quantum physics/classical physics can
be made, a<span style="font-size: x-small;">nd</span> a correlation between astrophysics/biophysics <span style="font-size: x-small;">also</span>. An
understanding of biology at its most fundamental level is possible. A
relationship/link, in terms of energy exists between earthly physics and extra
terrestrial physics. The continuum is dynamic/orderly. Nothing is by chance.
Nothing is falling. All matter is driven/controlled, by inherent energy of
longitudinally travelling, contra directional, fieldstreams.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">PRECISION
ORBITING</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> No science has yet adequately described how
satellites within the solar system, orbit the sun with such precision and
without collision. As observed by Kepler, they move in elliptical orbits. His
third law describes their distances from the sun. Newton described mathematically their
movements in terms of gravity. Gravity, as a prime force, is widely
accepted to be all powerful, yet it cannot account for movements that take
place, nor why these movements are elliptical. Artificial satellites require
correction to maintain them in the desired orbit, but natural satellites do not.</span></span>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> What force promotes movement? Why do
artificial satellites require orbit correction, whereas natural satellites do
not? If the effect of gravity on a satellite
is equal in all directions, as per Newtonian theory, why are their orbits
elliptical, not circular? Why do planets within the solar system
orbit the sun in the same direction (regular)? What promotes the relationship
between the distance of the satellite from the sun, and the period of orbit
(Kepler's third law)?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Natural bodies are composed of mass-field
vortices named Elemental Mass-Field <span style="font-size: x-small;">V</span>ortice <span style="font-size: x-small;">S</span>ystems (atoms). These are accrued
from inherent energy within longitudinally travelling fieldstreams of the
body’s dynamic cradle, and to specific number/energy ratios. These
contain immense energy, but unavailable to a specific system unless given
expression. Kinetic energy gives this expression as a result of eccentric
rotation of the asymmetric focal region within the nucleus of each elemental mass-field
vortice system (atom) as it axially rotates. The longitudinally travelling
field streams, rooted into the focal region, precess, in so doing beat against mainstream fields<span style="font-size: x-small;"> thus</span> generating two kine</span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">tic <span style="font-size: x-small;">e</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">ffects:-</span></span><br />
<div style="margin-left: 17pt; text-indent: -11.35pt;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·<span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><span style="font-size: x-small;">Directional
Effect<br clear="all" />
</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-left: 17pt; text-indent: -11.35pt;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·<span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><span style="font-size: x-small;">Vortice
Radiation </span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">A summation of Directional Effects power
movement of the body, and Vortice Radiation heats the body.</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> The body generates secondary travelling fieldstreams, and orbit in prescribed orbits, as in the case of shells of the
atom<span style="font-size: x-small;">, and</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">a</span>s in the case of the atom, to the Pauli's exclusion principle<span style="font-size: x-small;">,</span> <i>(More than one satellite cannot occupy the
same energy state<span style="font-size: x-small;">)</span></i>. Fieldstreams to/from the body interact, which hold it to
controlled formation. Artificial satellites however, do not
generate secondary travelling fieldstreams, therefore cannot prescribe their
own orbit. Their orbits are maintained by gravitational effect (in Vortice
Physics, gravitational effect is a dynamic function). The exclusion principle
therefore does not apply and as a result, their orbits need to be corrected. The phenomenon of Pauli
pressure, familiar at the atomic level, in astrophysics, is equivalent to
Kepler’s third law. In both cases, field energy is the controlling factor.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">
</span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">MATTER
DENSITY AND DISTRIBUTION</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>It is widely accepted that gravity, as a
prime force, accounts for the control of universal phenomena. Newton's theory is that every particle
directly attracts every other particle, pro rata to its mass, and is indirectly
related to its distance. If gravity, as a prime force, accounts for this
effect, one would expect uniform distribution of matter. However,
this is not what is observed. Matter is clumped in groups, and separated non
uniformly. This clearly is a violation of Newton's
law. A law can only be a law, if it withstands all tests put to it.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> Why is matter coalesced into bodies, stars,
planets, galaxies etc? What maintains their shape? Why is there such a wide
variation in density and distribution?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>. </b>Universal phenomena is orientated into, two
element, longitudinally travelling, contra directional, asymmetric, mass-field
vortice<span style="font-size: x-small;"> systems</span>. <span style="font-size: x-small;">E</span>nergy within fieldstreams of these
vortices, increase exponentially on accrual to the focal region. At/near, the
focal region, the density and asymmetry is such that mass-field vortice systems <span style="font-size: x-small;">of</span> a lesser order of magnitude manifest. Kinetic energy, generated in each elemental
mass-field vortice system (atom) generates Directional Effect, promoting
cohesion into molecules. Vortice Physics posit<span style="font-size: x-small;"> t</span>he
reason why universal phenomena is not homogeneous, is because energy, hence
Directional Effect is unique to the cosmic region.</span></span><br />
<br />
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">MOVEMENT</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">
</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> No science has yet adequately quantified
Galileo's statement that movement is the natural norm. Descartes considered it, <i>Inspired
by God</i>. Newton's
theories of motion propose reasons for it not stopping, but not for what
started it. Movement is universal, from the atomic, to the galactic
scale. Natural phenomena exist only in a state of movement.</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> What is the cause of all this movement? What
is the prime mover? Why cannot natural phenomena exist in a static state?</span></span>
<br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> The prime source of energy is within
longitudinally travelling fieldstreams, from which elemental mass-field
vortices accrue. Accrued fieldstreams root into the asymmetric focal region of
the nucleus, causing it to precess as it rotates axially. Precessing fieldstreams beat against mainstream travelling fieldstreams, generating kinetic energy
in the form of exponentially diminishing waves. Travelling
wave energy then powers movement, or potential movement, of an atom, and summarily the planet. Mass-field
vortice<span style="font-size: x-small;"> systems</span> accrue from inherent energy of universally travelling fieldstreams. A body
generates secondary longitudinally travelling fieldstreams, which integrate with the primary, then go on to <span style="font-size: x-small;">power</span> daughter systems<span style="font-size: x-small;">.</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">I</span>ntegrated, two element, longitudinally travelling, contra
directional, fieldstreams cradle the body. Because fieldstreams travelling to a
body are inherently asymmetric, i.e. unequal speed/density between primary/secondary,
matter which is produced is distributed asymmetrically. Every elemental mass-field
vortice comprising a body, experiences unique Directional Effect, summarily powering
rotation/orbit of the <span style="font-size: x-small;">body</span>.</span></span> </div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">WHICH
PHYSICS</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>Problems arise when trying to relate quantum
physics with astrophysics. Earthly phenomena, is widely described by quantum
physics, while cosmic phenomena is widely described by classical physics. It is
akin to saying that an astronaut <span style="font-size: x-small;">is</span> in an environment governed by different
physics to that of <span style="font-size: x-small;">his</span> earthbound cousin<span style="font-size: x-small;">s</span>. This, despite a relatively short
distance from earth. It is like saying that people in the south of Britain
are governed by a different set of physics to those of the north. That, in this
comparatively short distance, physics undergo a fundamental transformation. The term Space, and Vacuum, are
frequently used. These terms imply nothingness. It seems contrary to common
sense, as well as sound physics, that such a contrast of environmental
conditions can occur within such short distance.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> How can there be such a transfer in physics within
such a short distance? How can it be so readily accepted that
a vacuum can exist, while accepting that <i>Nature Abhors a Vacuum</i>. How can
one travel from teeming activity, as on earth's surface, to nothingness, so
called Space, within such a short distance?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> <span style="font-size: x-small;">Vortice Physics posit that <span style="font-size: x-small;">t</span></span>he same fundamental physics apply
universally. They are that bodies, whether <span style="font-size: x-small;">element</span>, planet, or star, are
cradled within, </span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">contra directional</span></span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">, longitudinally travelling, integrated, equatorially orientated, fieldstream cradles. In the case of earth, primary travelling fieldstreams (accreted from secondary of the solar
system) integrate with secondary <span style="font-size: x-small;">fieldstreams </span>generated within <span style="font-size: x-small;">its</span> body. In the case of the atom, the nucleus is cradled within a
fieldstream cradle as described for earth. The difference is one of scale/asymmetry/rotational speed etc.
only. E</span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">lemental mass-field vortice
systems (atoms) power <span style="font-size: x-small;">an</span> orbiting craft and the biomass of <span style="font-size: x-small;">an</span> astronaut alike.
Coronal field-vortices, described in Vortice Physics, augment elemental mass-field
vortices with energy, although these diminish exponentially with
distance from earth. Astronauts are in essentially the same
physics to that of their earthbound cousins, except that they are at a region
closer to the periphery of the fieldstream cradle, therefore are in a less
dense fieldstream environment. They are weightless because their dynamic
gravitational effect, described in Vortice Physics, is countered by centrifugal
forces, for their particular orbit and velocity. Their biomass is powered by
inherent energy within longitudinally travelling fieldstreams, albeit at a
lower amplitude to that of their earthbound cousins. They have no atmosphere,
and in this regard they are in a vacuum, but an energy powers/maintains the
cohesion of their bio matter. In this regard they are not in a vacuum.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">ASTEROIDS
METEORS AND METEORITES</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>Earth is travelling about the sun at approx.
30 kilometres per second. Considerable meteoric debris enters earth's <span style="font-size: x-small;">system</span>, particularly crossing comet tails, and is usually burned before reaching the surface. Some meteoric material
has been known to reach the surface, even injure life forms, but this is
comparatively rare. Earth then, has an effective shield
against this kind of hazard. The atmosphere, elements of which are widely
believed to be the heating agent, has a thickness of a few kilometres only and
this rapidly thins with altitude. It is unlikely by itself therefore, to be an
effective burning agent of meteoritic material of a substantial size, unless
preheated.</span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;"> </span></b></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> How is it that so much meteoritic material
enters earth's system, yet so little penetrate to the surface? If meteoritic
material is in the path of earth as it orbits the sun, as is the case at early mornings,
why are strikes not more frequent at these times?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> It is the travelling fieldstreams of
earth's cradle which act as a shield to inter planetary debris. It is these
which meteoric material encounters as it nears the earth, driven
by an exponentially increasing Directional Force (Gravitational Effect) in each
of the elemental mass-field vortice systems comprising <span style="font-size: x-small;">it</span>. An interaction (friction) ensues, which
preheats the meteoric material, increasing electro-chemical action of its
matter. It cannot burn however, until it encounters sufficient elemental mass-field
vortice systems of opposite polarity to that of its own matter, namely oxygen.
This it does on entering the atmosphere. Meteoric material then, burns by a
comparatively brief exposure to oxygen within the atmosphere, but can only do
so because it is preheated by <span style="font-size: x-small;">a</span> buffer effect against fieldstreams of earth's
cradle, long before it encounters oxygen.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">THE
LUNAR SKY</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>Few stars are seen in the lunar sky. From the
surface of the moon, the earth in seen within an inky blackness, with few stars
surrounding it.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>. </b>The night sky, when seen from earth, is well
known. At any one time approx. 2 k stars can be seen. In view of the relatively
short distance between earth-moon, and with widely accepted concepts of light
propagation, is this not a surprising fact?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics posit that a light path is
influenced by energy within longitudinally travelling fieldstreams which are
orientated into mass-field vortice systems. Light from distant galaxies enters
the mass-field vortice system of the Milky Way galaxy via its apogee region. It is routed about the galaxy, enters the solar
system, again via the apogee region, thence routed to earth. The lunar system is cocooned within earth's system, therefore starlight, other than that arriving at oblique angles to
the horizontal cannot reach it, hence this phenomenon. </span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">PLATO'S
CAVE</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>No philosophy has yet given a total account
of the natural environment in all of its dynamics. The results of these
dynamics, wind and wave etc., are readily seen in natural phenomena all about
us, but the prime energy underlying these, is going unrecogni<span style="font-size: x-small;">s</span>ed. We
are as slaves in Plato's Cave.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> How can all of these dynamics be explained
in one overall philosophy? How can the chains be cast off, as did Plato's
slave, and recognise the fundamental truth of <span style="font-size: x-small;">nature</span>, instead of
dancing unknowingly to its tune?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics and Orientation Physics
together, provide an explanation to the dance. Vortice Physics describe the
prime energy that powers natural phenomena, and Orientation Physics describe
how life forms respond to, and utilise, this energy. For healthy life we have no choice but
to dance to natural energy, but an understanding of its fundamental physics
enable us to know its tune.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">DYNAMIC
LINK</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> Much earthly phenomena occurs in association
with other phenomena without any apparent direct link between them. For
instance, when the numbers of electrons in an atom change (transmutation) the
number of nuclear particles change proportionately, yet no dynamic relationship
is yet established to exist between the electron and the nucleus. A number of earthly phenomena are seen
to follow a cycle in phase with the 22 yr solar cycle. For
instance, weather patterns, ocean tides, bio meteorology, particularly in the
blood of babies, yet no dynamic relationship is widely established to exist
between the earth and the sun.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> How can processes which are clearly related,
take place without a direct dynamic relationship between them? How does the
nucleus of an atom know that the numbers of electrons have changed? How do
weather patterns know that solar activity has changed? How can bio organisms
change with the sun's cycle, without a direct relationship between them?</span></span>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics posit that the entire solar
system is driven by longitudinally travelling, contra directional, fieldstreams,
in the form of a vortice, which modulates in energy content to 22 yr and 160 yr<span style="font-size: x-small;"> cycles</span>. This means that each body, from the nucleus of an
element, to the nucleus of the solar system (sun) has a dynamic relationship,
by way of energy/polarity. As the energy/polarity within the solar system as a
whole modulates, all of its vortice systems, planets, elements, modulate proportionately.</span></span>
<br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">MISSING
MASS</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>Considerably more mass is required to account
for cosmic functions, in order to satisfy Newtonian physics. Calculations
indicate more than 95% of ma<span style="font-size: x-small;">ss</span> is needed. For this reason the terms <i>Missing
Mass</i> and <i>Dark Matter</i> have come into being. This clearly is a
violation of Newtonian laws, which are that gravity, as a prime force, depends
solely upon ma<span style="font-size: x-small;">ss</span> to produce it. Confidence in gravitational theory has
been gained over the centuries, until now it is accepted as a law. A law
however, must withstand all tests put to it. The last few
decades of scientific advance have indicated some anomalies with widely accepted gravitational
physics which have not yet been resolved. For instance, the slowing of probes
in the proximity of planets, as observed by various NASA projects, and the
wandering <i>F</i> ring of the planet Saturn, on the Voyager 2 project.</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> If gravity is a prime force, why can't it be
measured directly as can other forces such as heat, pressure, etc.? How can
cosmological phenomena function when over 95% of the necessary mass to effect
it, is not there? The laws of thermodynamics require that
energies are transmutable. If gravity is a prime energy, why is it not
transmutable into other energies, such as heat, work, etc.? Why can't it be
reconciled with quantum physics?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics posit that gravity is an effect,
not a force per se. It is brought about by dynamics of energy fieldstreams,
which are prime forces. Eccentric rotation of the focal region of elemental
nuclei generates kinetic forces in the form of exponentially diminishing waves
throughout a mass-field vortice system. These
in turn produce Directional Effect<span style="font-size: x-small;"> and </span>Gravitational Effect. Universal phenomena is dynamic. Energy,
which accounts for its morphology, also drives it. This energy is all
pervading. It drives all other natural phenomena. It is the so called <i>Dark
Matter</i>. The Missing Mass question does not arise because ma<span style="font-size: x-small;">ss</span> is an
expression of energy fieldstreams, not the creator of a force.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">CONTAINMENT</span></span>
</div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> Newtonian Physics do not adequately describe
how earth maintain<span style="font-size: x-small;">s</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">its</span> shape. The greater part of <span style="font-size: x-small;">it</span> is
fluid. The crust is relatively thin by comparison to the main body, and is
constantly changing, as seen in plate tectonics. It is widely accepted that the only
effective way of containing a fluid is achieved from without, rather than from
within. For example, an egg by its shell.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> How can the planet be maintained from
within, while undergoing stresses as a result of rotational and orbital
functions, without its fluid matter flowing out of shape?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics posit that the planet is
contained from without, and within. It is cradled within energy fieldstreams
which coral mass-field vortice systems of a lower order of magnitude (atoms). The stresses incurred due to rotation
and changes in velocity, as the system orbits the sun, are borne by the entire
mass of the planet. The stresses are relayed into the fieldstreams of the
cradle. Each elemental mass-field vortice system responds <span style="font-size: x-small;">uniquely</span> to
changes taking place within the fieldstream environment. A flexing in the shape of the whole planet
takes place as a result of the dynamics of individual elemental mass-field
vortice systems acting in unison. Flexing is mainly caused by inertial forces when at
the aphelion/perihelion regions, in its orbit about the sun.</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">ORBITAL
DIRECTION</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> No satisfactory explanation has yet been put
forward to the observation of Laplace, that
planets of the solar system orbit the sun in the same direction (regular).</span></span>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>. </b>In view of the differences between them,
size, mass, etc., is this not a surprising fact? Why do the planets not orbit
the sun in different directions? Why do they all orbit in the equatorial plane,
and not in a polar plane? Indeed, what makes them orbit at all?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> A resultant Directional vector force is
produced within each planet, as a result of a summation of unique directional forces
within its constituent elemental mass-field vortice systems (atoms). Direction
of each elemental mass-field vortice system is opposite to that of the
primary travelling fieldstreams of the solar system. As these are clockwise,
the
planets therefore orbit anti clockwise.</span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">NATURAL
RATIO'S</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>No satisfactory explanation has yet been put
forward as to why certain natural ratios exist. For example, the Fibonacci
series (Golden Ratio) and the dimensions of a virus to that of a large organism
such as a tree, being approx. the same as that between the tree and the sun.
The same ratio exists between the smallest, and the largest, of earthly
phenomena. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>. </b>Does it not seem remarkable that without a
common factor linking these, that <span style="font-size: x-small;">it</span> is so? What would be the
implications if these ratios did not exist?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> An energy chain, in the form of travelling fieldstreams, links all natural phenomena. The energy is exponentially distributed
to the planets from the sun via their respective accretion regions. Earth's natural elements are
proportioned by this field link, therefore they manifest in a controlled energy ratio
with that of fieldstreams of the solar system. Nature is unaware of absolutes, but
maintains proportions. To put it another way, natures only absolute is to
maintain proportions, and does so by energy distribution.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">ENTROPY</span></span>
</div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> Thermodynamic processes are independent of
scale. A process which takes place in a laboratory is to the same parameters as
the process on the macro scale. The second law of thermodynamics is that
entropy increases when work is done in a closed system. Alternatively for
entropy to remain constant with work done, the system must be open. For entropy
to remain constant with outgoing energy, the process must be supplied with
energy to equate it.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> This poses the question. If earth is a
closed system, why has it not overheated <i></i></span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">over millennia, </span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">with <span style="font-size: x-small;">work </span>done by natural processes<span style="font-size: x-small;">?</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">T</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">he so called <i>Heat Death. </i></span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics posit that neither earth nor
the sun, are closed systems. Nor indeed, is any other mass-field vortice
system. An energy chain links cosmic phenomena and
regulates each system. The energy link governs the way in which the activities
manifest, and excess energy is radiated away.<span style="font-size: x-small;"> A</span> system is self regulatory. As
entropy increases with work done, energy to the equivalent amount is
passed on
in the energy chain or emitted from earth's system by way of radiation.
Energy
is received by the <span style="font-size: x-small;">solar system</span> from its 2 m yr upstream system (body not seen from earth) which maintains thermo-nuclear processes of the sun, and its radiation
output. Energy is passed on to the planets <span style="font-size: x-small;">via</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">its</span> secondary longitudinally travelling fieldstreams. It is therefore an open system. Its
entropy remains constant because energy is received to the equivalent amount to
that of its output. Furthermore, as originally conceived by the German
physicist Clausius, universal entropy is not a constant, but modulates about a
nominal value. Vortice Physics posit that this value is nominal only for a
specific region, and will vary universally, as do all other thermodynamic
phenomena.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">SEASONAL VARIATIONS OF ENERGY WITHIN
LONGITUDINALLY TRAVELLING FIELDSTREAMS</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> Seasonal differences are <span style="font-size: x-small;">widely</span> regarded
to be due solely to the amount of energy earth receives from the sun by way of
radiation. Earth is some 4 m kilometres closer to the
sun during the perihelion region of its orbit than at its aphelion region.
Winter, in the northern hemisphere, is when the orbit is throughout the
perihelion region, and summer throughout the aphelion region.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> Albeit some temperature differences arise
from earth's attitude to the sun (angle of tilt). It is posited that the mathematics of heat
propagation throughout a difference of 4 m kilometres, is such that earth would
experience far greater differences in temperature than that which is brought
about by the angle of tilt. Why then is winter when earth is closest to the sun
and summer when earth is furthest from the sun?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics posit that, while solar
radiation augments the heat energy received by earth, it is not the main
source. The main source is emission of radiation from the entire<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span>elemental mass-field
vortice<span style="font-size: x-small;"> systems</span> which make up earth's matter, in turn powered by energy within
longitudinally travelling fieldstreams that constitute <span style="font-size: x-small;">the</span> cradle.<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span>The cradle in turn, accretes from secondary travelling fieldstreams of the sun.<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> E</span></span>arth maintains a nominal mass
bank which varies throughout its orbit about the sun. Throughout the perihelion
phase, energy within primary fieldstreams (secondary of the sun) <span style="font-size: x-small;">manifests as</span> matter. Conversely,
throughout the aphelion phase, matter is relinquished into energy within
secondary<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span>fieldstreams, and radiation. The extent is to:- e = mc2. A proportion of energy within
secondary longitudinally travelling fieldstreams is passed on, from which the
lunar system accretes. A proportion heats the body of the earth. This
is the main heat source of the planet during the aphelion phase of <span style="font-size: x-small;">its</span> orbit
(summer). Coronal field-vortices within the atmosphere are produced in
characteristics such that emissions from the<span style="font-size: x-small;">m</span>, stimulated by solar radiation throughout the day period,
are the main light energy<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span>source.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">CARBON
14</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>It has been established by Bond that
production<b> </b>of carbon 14 varies in phase with major climate temperature
changes, but how this occurs has not been adequately explained.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> Carbon 14 is produced by an interaction of
high energy radiation with nitrogen elements within the atmosphere. This
radiation appears to come from all directions<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">and its intensity is influenced by phases of the
sun's activity.</span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> It has been suggested that it is
cosmic in origin. If the source of this radiation is cosmic and omni directional,
why should the activity of the sun influence it?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>. </b>Vortice Physics posit that planet earth is
the focal region of a mass-field vortice system. Contra directional,
longitudinally travelling, fieldstreams cradle<span style="font-size: x-small;">/</span>power<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span>it. Coronal field-vortices are produced
from their inherent energy in upwards of 500 varieties, which diminish with
distance from the surface of the earth to the inverse square law. It is these
coronal field-vortices which, when stimulated by solar radiation, emit streams
of vortice radiation (photons) from their apogee regions. These, when modulated by azimuth
movement of the whole vortice form <span style="font-size: x-small;">a</span> sinusoidal waveform, <span style="font-size: x-small;">in</span>
a wide range of frequencies. Some are detectable by life forms which have
evolved to detect regions of the spectrum around 10\15 Hz (daylight). Some are
high frequency and it is these that modify a percentage of carbon 12 elements,
into carbon 14. Vortice Physics posit that the percentage of carbon elements
within the environment has varied in phase with mass accrual/relinquish of
earth’s body over innumerable cycles. So too has carbon 14 pro rata. Carbon
elements are ambient within the environment, and because of this, the radiation
is omni directional. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">OCEAN TIDES</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>An anomaly exists with regard to ocean tidal
phenomena. It is widely accepted that satellites of a system are influenced by their
upstream body. For instance, the planets of the solar system by the sun.
However, it is also<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span>widely believed that the moon exerts a greater influence on
ocean tides than that of the sun.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>. </b>How can this be? How can a satellite of a
body (moon) exert a greater influence on a body (earth) than its upstream body
(sun)?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>. </b>Vortice Physics posit that the lunar system
is powered, by earth’s system, and the whole earth/lunar system powered by fieldstreams of the solar system which are modulated by eccentric rotation of the
focal region within the body of the sun <span style="font-size: x-small;">to</span> a 29 day cycle. The shape of the
earth follows this cycle, modulated by orbit of the lunar system to the same 29 day cycle. The effect
on the oceans is to bring about a travelling wave around the earth in phase with these
characteristics, and in a west-east direction. The whole phenomenon is dynamic, the only gravitational effect
being the cumulative directional effects generated in each molecule of water towards earth's focal region. </span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">GRAVITATIONAL
EFFECT<b>. </b></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The
widely accepted concept of gravity is that it is a prime force, generated by
mass of a body, and that matter is drawn by this force to its centre.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>. </b>If
this is the case, why cannot this force be measured directly? For example, between
matter and the surface of the earth. No force can be detected under say, a
person sitting on a chair.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>. </b>Vortice
Physics posit that gravity is a generated effect produced in each
element/molecule of matter, not a force per se. It is produced by Directional
Effect, in turn produced by kinetic energy, and this generated by precessing
longitudinally travelling fieldstreams as a result of eccentric rotation of
the focal region within a body as it axially rotates. The precessing fieldstreams beat against mainstream longitudinally travelling fieldstreams in each element. The
scale is infinite. The focal region of a body may be within the earth or an elemental
mass-field vortice system (atom).</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">LOCAL
BLINDNESS</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>C. </b>Astronomers look seemingly into distances
greater and greater away from earth, yet the cosmology of our own galaxy is not
fully understood. The Milky Way is widely believed to be the focal region of it,
yet no appreciable increase in brightness magnitude toward <span style="font-size: x-small;">this </span>region is
seen. Other galaxies show a considerable increase in brightness from the
periphery, towards the focal region.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> If the Milky Way galaxy has a bright focal
region as do others, and from our relatively close proximity to it, why can't
it be seen as such? If the Milky Way is seen in direct line of sight, why is it
visible at all times, including when the earth's night phase is 180 degrees
rotated, as it is between apogee/perigee positions in its annual orbit about
the sun?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>. </b>Vortice Physics posits that light is
propagated by directional effect of an energy packet in the form of a vortice
(photon). It is powered by energy inherent within the longitudinally travelling
fieldstream medium through which it is travelling. The influence on the photon is not
sufficient to contain it within the system in which it is produced, therefore
it can propagate into its upstream system, but is directed away from its
daughter system/s. The daughter system/s becomes cocooned from light sources
upstream in the energy chain. The Milky Way is not the focal region,
but the periphery of the galaxy. Light in the form of field-vortices (photons)
travel from this periphery, to the earth, by a series of spiral routes
throughout the Local Group. The focal region of our galaxy cannot
be seen from earth because directional effect on the photons route them to the
periphery of the galactic, thereby cocooning the Local
Group, part of which is the solar system. Only phenomena downstream of the Local
Group in the arm of the galaxy can be seen from earth. Information of other
galaxies comes to us by way of this peripheral region of the galaxy. Radiation
circum-travels a region of our galaxy encompassing the Local Group, then the mass-field
vortices of systems comprising it before arriving at the <span style="font-size: x-small;">solar system</span>. The Milky Way band is continually seen
because of the opposite phenomenon to the outgoing photon. Rotation of the
earth by 180 degrees with respect to the distant stars, while has some affect
on where the light is received, does not eclipse it, as would be the case in
direct line of sight propagation. The only position to see the focal region of
our own galaxy is from another galaxy, or regions in between.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">SEARCH
FOR EXTRA TERRESTRIAL INTELLIGENCE (SETI)</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> This project has been carried out for some yrs
without receiving any indication of an intelligent life form, in spite of the
fact that the antennas employed are capable of receiving extremely weak
signals, and with the use of sophisticated filtering techniques. Orientation Physics posit that
intelligent life is a natural outcome of evolutionary development on a planet
that is otherwise suitable. Species that prevail are ones that adopt an upright
stance, thereby quickening their metabolic rate by being in a higher/denser
longitudinally travelling fieldstream level than those orientated in a
horizontal stance. A quickening metabolism requires considerably greater
orientation to the travelling field environment, and therefore appropriate
neurological processes to supervise it. In view of the vast number of universal
combinations, it is more likely than not therefore, that intelligent life has evolved
somewhere.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> Is it not odd then, that no intelligent
signals have been received? Does it not suggest that there is a positive
deterrent to receipt of signals?</span></span> <br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b>
Vortice Physics posit that universal
phenomena is orientated into, two element, integrated, longitudinally
travelling, contra directional, asymmetric, mass-field vortice systems.
Each mass-field vortice system accrues from fieldstreams
of an upstream system forming an energy chain. Vortice radiation (photons) are not
unfettered, to travel where they will, but powered and controlled by inherent
forces within the fieldstream ether through which they are travelling, and which
provide their <span style="font-size: x-small;">propagational </span>power. These forces
maintain their amplitude, and imbue them with inherent directional properties,
which then force them to follow a complementary route to that of the fieldstreams of the vortice system through which they are travelling. The signal may
circum navigate a mass-field vortice system many times before travelling on to
another. A photon stream is emitted from the
apogee region of its source system, powered by kinetic energy generated by
precessing fieldstreams beating against mainstream travelling fieldstreams, due to eccentric
rotation of its asymmetric focal region into which the travelling fieldstreams are
rooted, and modulated into a sinusoidal travelling wave by azimuth movement at
its source system. These factors then, cause the <span style="font-size: x-small;">photon stream</span> from upstream sources, to propagate
away from its cocooned downstream systems, therefore radiation from systems
upstream of the solar system cannot be detected at the earth. This means of
course, that if there are any intelligent signals being transmitted from these
upstream systems, we cannot receive them. If intelligent signals are transmitted
from planets within other groups, or even from planets within the Local Group,
they would not be received at earth's position, therefore we cannot know of their
existence. There may well be planets within other solar systems orbiting the
body of the 2 m yr system (immediate upstream system of the solar system) or
indeed, many systems within the Local Group, that we cannot contact, nor they
us. The only signals which can be detected
at the earth, are those emitted from the outer regions of the galaxy, or from
other galaxies, which would reach earth by a series of decreasing spiral routes
throughout the Local Group. If such signals were to be received at the earth,
they would have had to have been transmitted at sufficient power that the
signal can be detected at earth after losses incurred throughout these <span style="font-size: x-small;">immensely</span> long spiral routes.</span></span> </div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">SHAPE
AND FORM</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>Anomalies exist with regard to maintenance of
shape/form, from the micro to macro scale. The macro scale, although not well
described, is widely accepted to result from gravity as a prime force. On the
scale of the atom however, again although not well described, gravity as a
prime force, is not widely held to play a shaping role, preferring nuclear and
electromagnetic forces to account for it. The two phenomena are so
fundamentally different in concept, that it is difficult to conceive that the
same shape (satellites orbiting a body) can be controlled by such widely
differing physics.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>. </b>How are the elements maintained? How do they
combine into molecules? What powers their movements? How is the solar system maintained
in the precise formation that it is? How is the spiral shape of the galaxy maintained? How is the galaxy clusters maintained? How is it that quantum physics can be so
well accounted for mathematically, yet gravitational physics is comparatively
sparsely accounted for mathematically? What is fundamental phenomena that
accounts for Pauli pressure? Why can't gravitational physics be correlated with
quantum physics?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> <span style="font-size: x-small;">E</span>nergy within a system is within the
area which constitutes a mass-field vortice. The fieldstream energy of this manifests
mass-field vortices of a lower order of magnitude, and corrals them to form a
body/nucleus. This is so from the sub atomic scale, to the scale of the solar
system, and beyond. It is this field energy which accounts for Pauli pressure.
It is this field energy which dynamically shapes all bodies. Gravity is an
effect of this prime field energy. Without this field energy in the area
between the bodies, form and shape could not be. Without this energy, the
system would not just collapse into a denser form, but simply would not exist.
Matter is <span style="font-size: x-small;">compacted</span> field energy. Field energy shapes matter. </span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">INVERSE
SQUARE LAW</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: red;"><b>C</b></span>. <span style="font-size: x-small;">The</span> Inverse Square Law extends
throughout much natural phenomena. Electromagnetic radiation, gravitational
effect, magnetic and electric forces, acoustic physics, etc. No hypothesis yet
has adequately explained why all of this phenomena, which propagate by
differing concepts, should subscribe to the same law.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> Why should natural phenomena, as different
in concept as gravity is to electromagnetic radiation, and acoustic physics are
to electric field forces, all adhere to the same law?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics are that all natural
phenomena is composed of field vortice<span style="font-size: x-small;"> systems</span>. A field-vortice<span style="font-size: x-small;"> system</span> accretes</span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> exponentially</span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">,</span> therefore all natural phenomena subscribe to the same law.</span></span>
<br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">ASYMMETRY</span></span>
</div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: red;"><b>C</b></span>. Asymmetry extends throughout nature.
Everywhere we see it. No tree is symmetrical. Nor is a leaf/fruit/flower. This
is described by the mathematics of Fibonacci. People’s faces are asymmetric. So
is a cell/amino acid/protein. The shape/mass of the earth is asymmetric, as is
the moon. Orbital movements of celestial bodies are asymmetric, as are
electrons about the nucleus of an <span style="font-size: x-small;">element</span>. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: blue;"><b>Q</b></span>. Why does asymmetry permeate nature?
What makes it so? What brings about a positive deterrent to symmetry? </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: lime;"><b>A</b></span>.
Matter, on any scale, is an expression of field energy from which it a<span style="font-size: x-small;">c</span>cre<span style="font-size: x-small;">t<span style="font-size: x-small;">e</span>s</span>.
As a field energy cradle is asymmetric, all manifested matter is likewise. Cohesion
of elements, powered by directional effect, is a result of asymmetric orbits of
electrons, promoting interaction with electrons of other elements (more
precisely the fieldstreams of electrons within other elements. Directional Effect results from asymmetry. Without it nothing could cohere but
since the manifestation of matter relies on asymmetry, without it there would
be nothing to cohere. Asymmetry/movement/matter are inter-related and
controlled by field-vortice phenomena. </span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">COLOUR </span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>It is widely accepted that colours seen
within the visible spectrum are associated with specific frequencies of
radiation emitted from the viewed object. However, no mechanism for why this is
so has yet been established.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>. </b>What creates the frequency of say, the colour
red compared to that of blue?</span></span> <br />
<div style="margin: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.
</b>An elemental mass-field
vortice <span style="font-size: x-small;">system </span>(atom) consists of a two element, longitudinally travelling, contra
directional, asymmetric, field-vortice, cradling and manifesting a nucleus at
its centre of focus. Th<span style="font-size: x-small;">e</span> nucleus consists of similar mass-field vortice<span style="font-size: x-small;"> systems</span> of lesser order of magnitude, each with its unique Directional Effect<span style="font-size: x-small;">,</span> corralled by the cradling fieldstreams. Because the longitudinally travelling fieldstreams of the cradle are rooted into the eccentrically rotating focal region
of the asymmetric nucleus, causing them to precess<span style="font-size: x-small;">,</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">t</span>hey beat against mainstream travelling fieldstreams generating kinetic energy in the form of
exponentially diminishing travelling waves which propagate throughout the <span style="font-size: x-small;">system</span> of the element. Vortice radiation (photons) is emitted at the
apogee region in a stream at a frequency determined by the rotation of the
nucleus, then modulated by azimuth movement of the whole vortice system,
causing the exit region to alternate direction, and in a correlation with the
mass of the element<span style="font-size: x-small;">. </span>The result is a sinusoidal
travelling wave, consisting of vortice radiation packets (photons). The rotation of the nucleus, and
therefore the emitted stream of vortice radiation, is specific to the element.
The nucleus of small, lighter elements, rotate quicker than larger, heavier
elements. As the characteristics of elemental mass-field vortice<span style="font-size: x-small;"> systems</span> differ, i.e.
size, mass of nucleus etc., so also the frequency of radiation, thence the
travelling wave. For
frequencies within the visible spectrum, the colour we see is unique to the
modulated emission of vortice radiation specific to the element. Emitted vortice radiation then is a
dynamic phenomenon, specific to the element, ultimately powered by inherent
energy within fieldstreams of the natural environment.</span></span> </div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">DUALISM</span></span>
</div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> Since Zoroaster, dualism has resounded
throughout philosophy. The philosophy of Descartes' is dualism of mind and
body. Tao philosophy includes Yin and Yang. Much natural phenomena manifests
dualistically. To name a few:-</span></span> <br />
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">North and South</span></span> </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Acid and Alkaline</span></span> </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Positive and Negative</span></span> </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Anterior and Posterior</span></span> </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Yin and Yang (male and female</span></span></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Bio matter orientates in pairs </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> <br />
</span></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Organs are in pairs, lungs, kidneys, etc</span></span> </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">DNA helix consists of two side chains</span></span> </li>
</ul>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: blue;"><b>Q</b></span>. With so much natural phenomena manifesting
dualistically, why is the underlying phenomena for this not quantified? Why is
natural phenomena not orientated into threes, or fours?</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> The natural field environment consists of dual,
integrated, longitudinally travelling, contra directional, polarity opposed, fieldstreams. The primary fieldstreams travel from east to west, while the
secondary fieldstreams travel from west to east.
These fieldstreams account for all earthly natural phenomena. Elemental mass-field
vortice systems (atoms) accrue from their energy.
Proto coronal field-vortices are also accrued from them<span style="font-size: x-small;">. </span>These are in upwards of 500 varieties (counted by Fraunhofer as emission lines). On absorbing, a la quantum physics, vortice
radiation emissions of lesser coronal field-vortices, the proto field-vortice
becomes a coronal field-vortice proper, producing directional effect, and emitt<span style="font-size: x-small;">ing<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span>vortice radiation. The emitted
vortice radiation, and in some cases the whole coronal field-vortice, can be
absorbed, a la quantum physics, into elemental mass-field vortice systems (atoms). The form
of the prime drive, together with the integrated secondary drive (fieldstreams
generated within the body) is dualistic therefore imbues all natural phenomena
with dualistic characteristics.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">SUB
ATOMIC ENERGY</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>. </b>Energy within an element can be calculated by
Einstein's mass-energy equation:-</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">e = mc\2</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Weapons have been produced, and
methods such as nuclear reactors have been developed to extract it, however,
while the energy equates matter, no theorems have yet been put forward as
to where the energy comes from to be in it in the first place. The amount of
energy is immense. The release of energy from 1 gram of matter yields approx.
10 to the power of 12 Joules.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> Where does this energy come from? What
powers electrons to maintain their speed of orbit about nuclei of elemental mass-field
vortice systems (atoms)?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Atoms resolve to pure field energy. The
electron, which is field energy in a compact form, accrue from fieldstreams of
an atom which in turn, accrue from energy within longitudinally travelling,
contra directional, fieldstreams which form earth's cradle. The speed/direction which the electron
orbits the nucleus, results from directional effect, powered by kinetic energy
in the form of waves within the vortice of the electron system, and is related
by proportion to fieldstreams of the atom. As these accrue from travelling fieldstreams of earth's travelling field cradle, are likewise proportionately
related. A mathematical relationship exists
between speed/orbit of the electron system, and with the region of accrual
(distance from nucleus). The square of the time in which each electron orbits
the nucleus, is proportional to the cube of its mean distance from the nucleus
(Kepler's third law). Vortice Physics posit that Kepler's laws apply equally to
the atomic scale, as they do to the astrophysic<span style="font-size: x-small;">al</span> scale.</span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">SUSTAINED EMISSION</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b>
As is
well known, elements above absolute zero continuously radiate,
amplitude/frequency unique to the element/temperature, albeit no power
source to the element is recognised.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: blue;"><b>Q</b>.</span> How
can an emitted stream of energy from an element be sustained without an equivalent energy input to <span style="font-size: x-small;">it</span>?</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: lime;"><b>A</b></span>.
Vortice physics posit
that an element is formed a<span style="font-size: x-small;">nd sustained by mainstream longitudinally travelling fieldstream<span style="font-size: x-small;"> energy</span>. <span style="font-size: x-small;">T</span>hese, beca<span style="font-size: x-small;">u</span>se of asymmetry, caus<span style="font-size: x-small;">e precessional fieldstreams,<span style="font-size: x-small;"> to beat against mainstream fieldstreams thus generating kinetic energy which sustains <span style="font-size: x-small;">photon emission.<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">TOTAL
UNDERSTANDING OF STRUCTURES</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>C.</b> If projects and
practices which have potential global hazard be undertaken, a total understanding <span style="font-size: x-small;">of the<span style="font-size: x-small;"> physics of the projects is necessary</span></span>. For example, if a leak occurs from a radioactive
process such as a reactor, it can spread across national boundaries.
There is no need to emphasise the dangers of this, except to say that without a
complete understanding of the physics of natural phenomena, sooner or later it
is a probability, rather than a possibility. Indeed some have already happened. Structures are a collection of element<span style="font-size: x-small;">s</span>
(mass-field vortice systems<span style="font-size: x-small;">) combined in molecular form</span>. For a structure to be understood, these elemental permutations must be
understood. However, at the heart of quantum physics, as currently widely
accepted, is a phenomenon known as the Uncertainty Principle. This is that the
precise phenomena of an element, in all of its characteristics, cannot be known
at any one time. If this phenomenon is true, the structures are composed of
elements, about which there is no certainty of form.</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> Is the electron a particle or a wave? How
can certainty, and therefore safety of these undertakings be achieved when
there is no certainty of the fundamental physics at the heart of the materials
which form them?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Vortice Physics posit that elemental mass-field
vortice systems accrue from energy within longitudinally travelling fieldstreams <span style="font-size: x-small;">which form </span>the natural environment. These are augmented by coronal
field-vortices and emissions thereof, also accrued from the travelling field
energy. Mass-field vortices involved in the
processes which take place within a reactor, and the containment vessel,
although of differing energ<span style="font-size: x-small;">y orders</span>, are to the same fundamental physics. This means
that power extracted from mass-field vortice processes taking place within <span style="font-size: x-small;">a</span> reactor, and elements which comprise the containment vessel, is
extracted from the field environment alike.<span style="font-size: x-small;"> E</span>nergy flow taking place in a
reactor is considerably greater than energy flow of the containment vessel, none the less, the same fundamental physics of
interchanging mass-field <span style="font-size: x-small;">physics</span> is taking place in both reactor, and containment vessel. <span style="font-size: x-small;">T</span>his aspect of
physics concerning nuclear reactors is of paramount importance when planning,
designing, and commissioning, such plants. All structures, in terms of fundamental
physics, are cohesion of elemental mass-field vortice systems (atoms). These<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span>elements compris<span style="font-size: x-small;">ing</span> large structures, bridges, dams,
ships etc., have accrued energy from, and are sustained by, earth's
travelling fieldstream environment. Dynamic forces (kinetic energy) within element<span style="font-size: x-small;">s</span>, bring about coherence of <span style="font-size: x-small;">molecular<span style="font-size: x-small;"> form </span></span>comprising the structure. If these structures are to be safely
commissioned, the underlying physics of cohesion
of its matter must be fully understood, particularly that <span style="font-size: x-small;">it</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">is</span> accrued/powered by the active,
energy rich, environment.</span></span> <br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">GAIA</span></span>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: red;">C</span>.</b> The planet and all that is on it, is a living
organism, in that all natural phenomena resolves to energy. James Lovelock has
posited a theory whereby all natural phenomena are inter-related. <span style="font-size: x-small;">It is</span> named it<i>
Gaia</i>, after the Greek goddess of the earth. No mechanism has yet been
put forward to describe it. According to Vortice Physics, earth
varies in size/mass/volume, having been somewhat larger/denser in Precambrian/Permian
periods, smaller and less dense, in Cambrian/Cretaceous periods. This
modulation belies the belief that it is a remnant of a past dynamic process,
i.e. <i>Big Bang</i>, in that it reduced between these periods, but has
enlarged since the Cretaceous period to the present time. If the energy
contained within earth's elements be totalled to Einstein's energy physics,
e.g. e = mc2, and taking the mass to be 10 to the power of 21, tonnes,
the amount would be considerably greater than the total daily output, by way of
radiation </span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">from the sun<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">in all directions<span style="font-size: x-small;">.</span> The planet is teeming with energy.
Winds, ocean tides, vulcan, etc., are readily appreciated as <span style="font-size: x-small;">forms</span> of
energy, but underlying these, and by far the greater amount, is the energy
inherent within elemental mass-field vortice systems (matter).</span></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: blue;">Q</span>.</b> What is this energy? Where does it
come from to sustain earth's matter in this relationship? Consider a bar of
metal under stress. Where does the energy come from to equate the work done by
the stress force? For example, a stress may be exerted on the bar for a
considerable time period. Where does the energy come from to maintain the molecular
links, in order to oppose the force imposed upon them by the stress, thereby
satisfying the laws of thermodynamics? Consider a permanent magnet performing
a work function. This again, may be over a prolonged time period. Work units
totalled over a time period could be considerably greater than the work
undertaken at any one time. Where does the energy come from to maintain the
molecules in a polarized state, when the work being done is continually
depolarizing them?</span></span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><span style="color: lime;">A</span>.</b> Each of earth's elements is accrued from
energy within longitudinally travelling, contra directional, fieldstreams that
form earth's cradle. They are also continually augmented with energy by
absorption into them of coronal field-vortices and emissions thereof, which are
also accrued from travelling fieldstreams. This is the <i>Gaia</i> concept. The
elements of the metal bar, and the magnet, receive energy from within
longitudinally travelling fieldstreams, and are augmented by coronal
field-vortices, to the equal of the work being done, thus maintaining the
cohesion/polarity of the molecular links.</span></span> <br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="post-footer">
<div class="post-footer-line post-footer-line-1">
<span class="post-author vcard">
Posted by
<span class="fn" itemprop="author" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person">
<a href="https://plus.google.com/106964233203298629691" rel="author" title="author profile">
<span itemprop="name">Edward Chandler</span>
</a>
</span>
</span>
<span class="post-timestamp">
at
<a class="timestamp-link" href="http://activeenvironment.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/critiques-questions-and-answers.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link"><abbr class="published" itemprop="datePublished" title="2011-12-02T16:14:00-08:00">16:14</abbr></a>
</span>
<span class="post-comment-link">
</span>
<span class="post-icons">
<span class="item-action">
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=219845077015303233&postID=4028019514878443905" title="Email Post">
<img alt="" class="icon-action" src="http://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif" height="13" width="18" />
</a>
</span>
<span class="item-control blog-admin pid-1411345268">
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=219845077015303233&postID=4028019514878443905&from=pencil" title="Edit Post">
<img alt="" class="icon-action" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif" height="18" width="18" />
</a>
</span>
</span>
<br />
<div class="post-share-buttons goog-inline-block">
<a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-email" href="http://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=219845077015303233&postID=4028019514878443905&target=email" target="_blank" title="Email This"><span class="share-button-link-text">Email This</span></a><a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-blog" href="http://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=219845077015303233&postID=4028019514878443905&target=blog" target="_blank" title="BlogThis!"><span class="share-button-link-text">BlogThis!</span></a><a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-twitter" href="http://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=219845077015303233&postID=4028019514878443905&target=twitter" target="_blank" title="Share to Twitter"><span class="share-button-link-text">Share to Twitter</span></a><a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-facebook" href="http://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=219845077015303233&postID=4028019514878443905&target=facebook" target="_blank" title="Share to Facebook"><span class="share-button-link-text">Share to Facebook</span></a>
</div>
<span class="post-backlinks post-comment-link">
</span>
</div>
<div class="post-footer-line post-footer-line-2">
<span class="post-labels">
</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</header><br />
<div class="main-outer">
<div class="fauxborder-left main-fauxborder-left">
<div class="region-inner main-inner">
<div class="columns fauxcolumns">
<div class="footer-outer">
<div class="column-center-outer">
<div class="column-center-inner">
<div class="main section" id="main">
<div class="widget Blog" id="Blog1">
<div class="blog-posts hfeed">
<div class="date-outer">
<div class="date-posts">
<div class="post-outer">
<div class="comments" id="comments">
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4865129571191002279" name="comments"></a>
<br />
<div id="backlinks-container">
<div id="Blog1_backlinks-container">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="blog-pager" id="blog-pager">
<span id="blog-pager-newer-link">
<a class="blog-pager-newer-link" href="http://activeenvironment.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/vortice-radiation.html" id="Blog1_blog-pager-newer-link" title="Newer Post">Newer Post</a>
</span>
<span id="blog-pager-older-link">
<a class="blog-pager-older-link" href="http://activeenvironment.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/active-environment-description-of.html" id="Blog1_blog-pager-older-link" title="Older Post">Older Post</a>
</span>
<a class="home-link" href="http://activeenvironment.blogspot.co.uk/">Home</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<footer>
</footer>
</div>
</div>
<div class="content-cap-bottom cap-bottom">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14192765123201972571noreply@blogger.com0